Policing and the Creation of Cosmopolitan Liberal Politics, 1950-1972

Policing has long been a central feature of American life. From the earliest days of the republic, police have been charged with maintaining order and protecting the public. However, the role of policing has changed over time, and it has been particularly contested during periods of social and political upheaval.

The Streets of San Francisco: Policing and the Creation of a Cosmopolitan Liberal Politics, 1950-1972 (Historical Studies of Urban America)

by Christopher Lowen Agee

4.7 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	5870 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	340 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE

The period from 1950 to 1972 was one of such upheaval. The civil rights movement, the Black Power movement, the anti-war movement, the women's liberation movement, and the gay rights movement all challenged the status quo and demanded change. These movements often clashed with the police, who were seen as symbols of the oppressive state.

However, policing also played a role in shaping the development of cosmopolitan liberal politics during this period. Cosmopolitan liberalism is a political ideology that emphasizes the importance of individual rights, human dignity, and global cooperation. It emerged as a response to the horrors of World War II and the Cold War, and it has been a major force in American politics ever since.

Cosmopolitan liberals have long been critical of policing. They argue that policing is often used to target and harass marginalized communities, and that it violates the rights of individuals.

However, cosmopolitan liberals have also recognized that policing can be a force for good. They have argued that policing can help to protect communities from crime and violence, and that it can play a role in promoting social justice.

The relationship between policing and cosmopolitan liberal politics is complex and evolving. However, it is clear that policing has played a significant role in shaping the development of cosmopolitan liberalism, both by providing a target for its critique and by offering a model for its own practice.

Policing as a Target of Critique

Cosmopolitan liberals have long been critical of policing. They argue that policing is often used to target and harass marginalized communities, and that it violates the rights of individuals.

This critique is rooted in the history of policing in the United States. From the earliest days of the republic, police have been used to control and suppress marginalized communities. This has been particularly true for communities of color, who have been subjected to police brutality, mass incarceration, and other forms of oppression.

In the 1950s and 1960s, the civil rights movement challenged the status quo and demanded an end to police brutality and discrimination. The movement's leaders argued that policing was a tool of white supremacy, and that it was used to maintain racial segregation and inequality.

The Black Power movement also emerged during this period, and it too was critical of policing. Black Power activists argued that the police were an occupying force in black communities, and that they were used to suppress black resistance.

The anti-war movement also clashed with the police during this period. Anti-war activists argued that the police were being used to suppress dissent, and that they were violating the rights of protesters.

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the women's liberation movement and the gay rights movement also began to challenge the role of policing. Women's liberation activists argued that the police were often complicit in violence against women, and that they failed to protect women from sexual assault and domestic violence.

Gay rights activists argued that the police harassed and discriminated against LGBTQ people. They also argued that the police failed to protect LGBTQ people from violence and discrimination.

These movements' critiques of policing helped to shape the development of cosmopolitan liberal politics. Cosmopolitan liberals adopted many of the critiques of policing that were developed by these movements, and they argued that policing needed to be reformed or even abolished.

Policing as a Model for Practice

However, cosmopolitan liberals have also recognized that policing can be a force for good. They argue that policing can help to protect communities from crime and violence, and that it can play a role in promoting social justice.

This view is rooted in the belief that policing is a necessary function of society. Cosmopolitan liberals argue that policing is essential for protecting the public from crime and violence, and that it can play a role in promoting social justice by protecting vulnerable communities and enforcing the law fairly.

In the 1960s and 1970s, some cosmopolitan liberals began to argue that policing could be reformed to make it more just and effective. They argued that police departments should be more diverse and representative of the communities they serve, and that they should adopt new strategies for policing that emphasized community engagement and problem-solving.

These ideas were incorporated into the community policing movement, which emerged in the 1980s and 1990s. Community policing強調建立信任 between police and the communities they serve, and it focuses on crime prevention and problem-solving rather than traditional law enforcement methods.

Community policing has been shown to be effective in reducing crime and improving police-community relations. However, it has also been criticized for being too lenient on crime and for failing to address the root causes of crime.

The debate over the role of policing in society is complex and ongoing. However, it is clear that policing has played a significant role in shaping the development of cosmopolitan liberal politics, both by providing a target for its critique and by offering a model for its own practice.

Policing is a central feature of American life, and it has been particularly contested during periods of social and political upheaval. The period from 1950 to 1972 was one such period, and it saw the emergence of cosmopolitan liberal politics as a major force in American politics.

Cosmopolitan liberals have long been critical of policing, and they have argued that it is often used to target and harass marginalized communities. However, cosmopolitan liberals have also recognized that policing can be a force for good, and they have argued that it can help to protect communities from crime and violence.

The relationship between policing and cosmopolitan liberal politics is complex and evolving. However, it is clear that policing has played a significant role in shaping the development of cosmopolitan liberalism, both by providing a target for its critique and by offering a model for its own practice.

The Streets of San Francisco: Policing and the Creation of a Cosmopolitan Liberal Politics, 1950-1972 (Historical Studies of Urban America)

by Christopher Lowen Agee

4.7 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	5870 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	340 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE