Member-only story

Saving Animals, Rebuilding Eden, and Other Myths of Conservation in Africa

Isaiah Price

·13.2k Followers· Follow

Published in White Man S Game: Saving Animals Rebuilding Eden And Other Myths Of Conservation In Africa

4 min read

297 View Claps

17 Respond

Save

Listen

The conservation movement in Africa is often framed in terms of heroic narratives of saving animals and rebuilding Eden. These narratives are powerful and emotive, but they can also be misleading and counterproductive.

White Man's Game: Saving Animals, Rebuilding Eden, and Other Myths of Conservation in Africa

by Stephanie Hanes

4.2 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	2717 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	304 pages

The 'Saving Animals' Myth

The 'saving animals' myth is based on the idea that humans have a moral obligation to protect animals from harm. This myth is often used to justify conservation efforts that focus on protecting individual animals, such as endangered species. However, this approach can be short-sighted and ineffective.

In reality, animals are part of complex ecosystems. Protecting individual animals without addressing the underlying threats to their habitats and populations is unlikely to be successful in the long term. For example, a study published in the journal Conservation Biology found that efforts to protect individual lions in Kenya actually led to an increase in lion attacks on humans, as the lions were forced to hunt in areas where they were more likely to come into contact with people.

The 'Rebuilding Eden' Myth

The 'rebuilding Eden' myth is based on the idea that humans have a responsibility to restore the natural world to its pristine state. This myth is often used to justify conservation efforts that focus on restoring habitats and reintroducing extinct species. However, this approach is also problematic.

In reality, the natural world is constantly changing. There is no such thing as a pristine state, and it is impossible to restore ecosystems to their former glory. Additionally, reintroducing extinct species can have unintended consequences. For example, a study published in the journal Science found that the re of wolves to Yellowstone National Park led to a decline in the population of elk, as the wolves preyed on the elk.

A More Nuanced Approach

A more nuanced approach to conservation in Africa is needed. This approach should focus on understanding the complex interactions between humans and wildlife, and on developing solutions that are tailored to the specific needs of each situation.

In some cases, it may be necessary to protect individual animals. However, this should only be done as part of a broader strategy that addresses the underlying threats to their populations. In other cases, it may be more appropriate to focus on restoring habitats and reconnecting fragmented ecosystems.

It is also important to remember that conservation is about more than just protecting animals. It is also about protecting the livelihoods and cultures of people who live in close proximity to wildlife.

The conservation movement in Africa is facing a number of challenges. However, by moving away from the myths of 'saving animals' and 'rebuilding Eden', and by adopting a more nuanced approach, it is possible to develop conservation strategies that are both effective and sustainable.

White Man's Game: Saving Animals, Rebuilding Eden, and Other Myths of Conservation in Africa

by Stephanie Hanes

4.2 out of 5